The Reason Files
  • Home
  • About
  • The Gospel
    • The Gospel Blog
  • Blog
    • Christian Persecution in America
  • Encyclopedia
  • Extras!
    • Free Downloads
    • Meme Gallery >
      • Meme Gallery Page 2
      • Meme Gallery Page 3
    • Links

Joy Reid and the Myth of Thanksgiving - Part 3: Genocide Continues

11/26/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
All of these conditions have been met and are being met in America today. Examples would be the historical genocide of the North American Indians (and yes, this includes putting them on reservations); or the genocide of African-American or “Black” People (I hate separating people according to the color of their skin. It takes away from their humanity) both historically by White Supremacists as well as historically and currently by Planned Parenthood who has made it guiding principle since its founding to abort (read that as murder) as many Black Babies as possible with the express intent of stunting the growth of the Black population to the point of unsustainability in order to eradicate them, a principle put forth by its founder Margaret Sanger. Even today, through its targeted and manipulative ads, the abortion rate in the Black Community is roughly 5 times higher than it is among Whites. By definition this is a form of genocide, and yet I do not hear anyone on the left calling for the abolishing of Planned Parenthood. Is it then safe to assume that those on the left support the genocide of Black people?
Picture
But I digress. What do you think is the most persecuted people group, the largest group in the world suffering the effects of genocide? Possibly even moreso than the Jews? It is the Christian Church. As any biblically true Christian can tell you, there is really only one Christian Church, and it consists of every single biblically born again believer throughout the world. All part of the one Christian Church. All part of the Body of Christ, and collectively known as the Bride of Christ.

Since its founding on the Day of Pentecost in 33AD the Christian Church has experienced severe persecution, always designed to eradicate Christianity from the globe, every year since its founding. That’s almost 2,000 years of unrelenting genocide. From Saul of Tarsus capturing Christians and having them imprisoned and killed to Nero using Christians as human torches to light up the Coliseum and his feast orgies (not to mention Nero feeding Christians to wild animals for his fun and amusement), and Domitian who not only strove to kill all the Christians, but he actively sent out Roman soldiers to confiscate every single copy of the Bible throughout the Roman Empire and destroy it. From the Roman Catholic church capturing as many Christians as they could and killing them by the sword & ax, by hanging and other forms of strangulation, by burning them alive at the stake (and many other forms of killing too gruesome to mention. You can Google it if you are entertained by that sort of thing); to localized Christian genocides such as the Armenian Genocide with between 1.2 and 1.5 million Christians were put to death; and from the Muslims persecuting and killing tens of thousands each and every year throughout world to the persecution Christians receive daily here in America. It seems that true biblical Christians face more backlash, more hatred, greater misrepresentation, false accusations and lies told about it than any group in America today. The goal, as stated by many who hate God, hate Jesus, hate the Bible, and hate true biblical Christians is to eradicate the Biblically true Christian Church in America, just as others are currently trying to around the world.

Picture
Remember the United Nations Genocide Convention’s definition of genocide that I previously cited? Genocide is not simply described as killing people as many suppose. It is about the eradication of one of the protected groups (such as Christians) by any means, including inflicting serious mental harm and deliberately inflicting condition of life calculated to cause the groups destruction. We already see the efforts of the government – both state (as in California) and Federal trying several measures that are designed to thwart or stop true biblical Christians from obeying God, which they are mandated by God to do; and, when people do not obey the commands of God they are in effect denying the only True and Living God. This is what these governments want to do and are trying to do, and they are supported in this form of genocide (as defined by the UN) by vast numbers of people in America, predominantly those on the left side of the political spectrum (though to be honest there are some on the right who want us gone as well).
I don’t know how many times I have heard people – and the government – lambaste Christians, mock them, belittle them, misrepresent them, lie about, and so forth, and this includes vast numbers of progressive pseudo-Christians (who for some reason think they can rewrite the Bible and redefine God and then be the true church. They are bald-faced liars and false teachers).

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
All of these actions, whether committed by the President, a member of his staff, a member of Congress, or any politician; or whether it is someone in the media or other form of entertainment; or whether it is two doors down or across the street –– they are engaged in a form of the genocide of the true biblical Christian Church in America.
And sadly, it seems that no one in this country, including the politicians, really cares. When someone makes insensitive comments about Jews, Muslims, or the LGBTQ+ community, people are up in arms (well, maybe not so much with Jews as antisemitism is on the rise in America). When people mock, belittle, or blaspheme Christians and Christianity –– crickets. But, this is to be expected. Jesus Himself said, “If the world hates you, you know that it has hated Me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A slave is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will persecute you as well; if they followed My word, they will follow yours also. But all these things they will do to you on account of My name, because they do not know the One who sent Me. If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin. The one who hates Me hates My Father also. If I had not done among them the works which no one else did, they would not have sin; but now they have both seen and hated Me and My Father as well. But this has happened so that the word that is written in their Law will be fulfilled: ‘They hated Me for no reason.’” (John 15:18-25 NASB95) [see also 1 John 3:13; 2 Peter 4:12-19].

If you are still with me after all of that, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. Sometimes I will come across a news item that just pushes me into a Popeye moment, when “I’ve taken all I can stands and I can’t stands n’more!”
With that said, thank you again and may our Great and Awesome God bless you abundantly, may our Wonderful Lord Jesus Christ shine the light of His countenance upon you, and may our Perfect Comforter and Teacher, God the Holy Spirit be with you always.


[The first two installments of this series can be found here and here]
0 Comments

Joy Reid and the Myth of Thanksgiving - Part 2: Genocide

11/26/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
The myth of the Pilgrim massacre of the Wampanoag Tribe has been perpetuated for more than 100 years, such as in this woodcut illustration, despite there being absolutely no evidence to support it.

It has been proposed that there was a group of indigenous tribes here possibly even before these ancient ancestors of the North American Indians. Many scholars, such as John Haywood (known as the “Father of Tennessee History”) and Joseph Henry (the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution) are known to believe and have believed (in the cases of those passed) that an ancient race of indigenous pygmies (for lack of a better description) inhabited areas of North America. There have been several mummies and numerous graves located regarding these “pygmies,” such as those in Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, and Tennessee.
When the mummies and skeletal remains were examined, it was determined these “pygmies” were no taller than 36 inches from head to foot. Some of them closer to 24 inches tall. Their skull brain capacity was equal to that of a child 7-9 years of age (leading some to believe these were the remains of children), but their teeth were not only fully developed permanent teeth, but they showed the severe wear that is common among mature adults.
Picture
The Nimerigar mummy, found in 1932 in the Pedro Mountains of Wyoming. Anthropologists and other scientists examining the mummy determined he had been a fully formed adult approximately 65 years of age.

Another interesting fact regarding these North America “Pygmies” is their appearance in the traditional history of many different North American Indian tribes. The tribes of British Columbia have within their history a recognition of very small people called the “Et-nane,” and the Cherokee history which mentions the existence of the “Little People” in eastern North America; while the history of the Shoshone and other tribes makes mention of the Nimerigar, a race of violent little people who were known to be cannibalistic, living in the Pedro Mountains of what is now Wyoming. Other North American Indian tribes that recognize these “Little People” are the Ҫatōl’ltq, the Tlatlasikwala, the Tsimshian, the Tlingit, the Umatilla, the Nez Perce, the Blackfoot, the Gros Ventre, the Arapaho, various bands of the Sioux, the Omaha, the Otoe, the Cheyenne, the Zuni and the Crow (see The Little People of the Pryor Mountains who were known as ferocious little people https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_People_of_the_Pryor_Mountains).
I bring up these “Little People” because none of them exist anymore. The reason they don’t is because they were victims of genocide (leading to their extinction) at the hands of those “indigenous” people who came after them. Genocide did not stop there. Many North American Indian tribes engaged in genocidal wars against other North American Indian tribes, both before and after the so-called “White Man” arrived in North America. Not only would they raid the villages of enemy tribes, killing many man, women, and children (especially babies as they swung them by their ankles, bashing their heads into trees and rocks – a quick death to be sure, but brutal and barbaric nonetheless). Many of these North American Indian tribes not only practiced the murderous aspect of genocide against opposing tribes, but they also captured survivors of their raids and enslaved them, often treating them as no more than simply dogs, and abusing them horribly. Many of these same tribes did the exact same thing to every settler or group of settlers they might come across.
Picture

As savage as these “indigenous” people were, not all North American Indians were like this. Do we use a broad brush and paint all North American Indians as barbaric savages practicing genocide, enslavement, and racism (yes, they did that too)? No, we don’t, because it would be wrong to accuse the innocent of the crimes of the guilty. In the same way it is wrong to accuse innocent “White” people of the crimes of those who are guilty of it – such as Mrs. Reid does in her appalling misrepresentation of the Pilgrims and the first Thanksgiving.
I could stop here, and it would make the point of Mrs. Reid’s intentional ignorance of history (intentional because she could have easily done a couple hours of research and learned the truth, but she chose not to), and her public demonstration of her ignorance on national television. She should be embarrassed as any right thinking person would be, but somehow I think she not only won’t be embarrassed, but she will double down on ridiculous statements and by launching a diatribe of ad hominems against her critics.
However, since we started out talking about Mrs. Reid’s false accusation of genocide, I think it only accurate to talk about one of the longest lasting genocides in the recorded history of man, with the largest body count of all groups, and equaled by perhaps only the Jewish people. Not only have the Jews been fighting against their eradication since the birth of their people, one cannot help but also remember the Nazi Holocaust and the Soviet Holocaust (which included Jews as well as others), and the countries of Iran, Syria, and indeed most of the Middle and Near East are trying and have been trying for millennia, to eradicate the Jewish People.
Before I go on, I think it is important to establish what is meant by the word genocide, what exactly is the definition of the word? Without going into a long mostly boring lecture on the etymology of the word, it is defined by the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, commonly known as the “Genocide Convention,” as:
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

     • Killing members of the group;

     • Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

     • Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

     • Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

    • Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

                                  https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml
Therefore, in order for something to be genocide it must first meet two conditions. First it must be against one of the following groups, 1. A national group, 2. an ethnical group, 3. a racial group, and 4. a religious group. Examples would be trying to destroy, in whole or in part, groups such as the Ukrainians, the North American Indians, “Black” people, or Muslims.

The second condition that must be met in order to legitimately be called a genocide is that the act or actions must be done with the intent to destroy one of these protected groups, and involves the five given examples above: Killing members of the group; and/or Causing serious bodily or mental harm to them; and/or deliberately inflicting condition of life calculated to cause the groups destruction; and/or imposing measure intended to prevent births within the group; and/or forcibly transferring children out of the group to another group.

[Part One can be found here, and Part Three here]
0 Comments

Joy Reid and the Myth of Thanksgiving

11/26/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
This is a rather long piece, so I have broken it down into three parts. Make sure your seat belts are secure and the safety bar is in the down and locked position. Remember to keep your arms and hands inside, and here we go.

Recently, Joy Reid, the host of MSNBC’s “The Reid Out,” stated the United States of America is a nation founded on violence. She said “we are a country that chooses violence over and over again”; and that the GOP (Republican Party) uses the Thanksgiving “fairy tale” to erase genocide. I must say at the outset that I abhor murder, and have an increased loathing when it comes to genocide. I believe there will be special punishment in Hell for those who commit murder and/or genocide. That being said, I would like to examine Mrs. Reid’s comments.

In one sense Mrs. Reid is correct. We are indeed a violent country, and our citizens seem to choose violence “over and over again.” We see repeated examples of this almost on a daily basis. From the thousands of shootings and stabbings, assaults and murders that happen each and every week nation-wide, to the verbal and psychological violence we experience each and every day from those around us, and those we expose ourselves to. However, while some of what Mrs. Reid says is unfortunately true, most of what she says is both false and misleading.

Was there a genocide taking place at the founding of America? Not necessarily. Now, it is certain that there were some people among the early settlers, as well as those who came later, who felt nothing but hatred and disdain toward the indigenous people – the North American Indians. They derided them, mocked them, abused them, and quite often killed them. But the Pilgrims who arrived in 1620 were a peaceful group, who quickly established a peaceful relationship with the Wampanoag Tribe, a relationship that lasted for more than 50 years, when the actions of a few individuals exploded into the King Phillip’s War (1675-1678).

Once the actual history is known, it becomes clear that what Mrs. Reid calls a “fairy tale” was actually true. Again, this does not mean that other people who were not part of the Pilgrim settlers were not hostile to the North American Indians. To be sure, there were people like that, but not the Pilgrims. In order to keep the history of America accurate here (something Mrs. Reid failed to do), the Pilgrims arrived in 1620. The actual first English colony, however, began in Jamestown, Virginia in 1607. But they were far from the first “White Men” to set foot in America. The Spanish arrived in 1565, and Leif Erickson, the Viking explorer from Iceland, arrived here in about 1000AD. Hundreds of years before Leif Erickson, however, an Irish explorer monk by the name of Brendan arrived in North America sometime between 512AD and 530AD. Of course there are those who believe Leif Erickson was the absolute first to arrive in North America, but they are unable to explain how in his explorations of North America he came across an Irish settlement. Maybe descendants of Brendan and his crew? But some scholars believe that even before Brendan, long before Brendan, there were Roman, Phoenician, Egyptian, and Arab traders and explorers that made it to North America.

Back to the Pilgrims and the North American Indians and the myth embraced by Mrs. Reid that the Pilgrims came to colonize North America and committed genocide against the indigenous peoples here. For many, many years, the popular teaching was that the Pilgrims killed off the Wampanoag’s by introducing them to smallpox. The problem with this theory is that there is no evidence to support it. There is, in fact, evidence that it had nothing to do with smallpox, and nothing to do with the Pilgrims.

The Wampanoag Tribe did indeed suffer a terrible disease, but it wasn’t smallpox, rather, it was a bacterial infection known as leptospirosis. The tribe suffered greatly as a result. This epidemic, however, began in 1615 and ended in 1619, all before the Pilgrims arrived in North America. While this is what the evidence shows to be true, far too many people today choose to ignore the truth and replace it with the myth of the “White Man” (naturally – for these people, to identify the alleged perpetrators by their racial and ethnic heritage, thus promoting racism and ethnic discrimination against this group), and laying the blame completely at his feet.

Again, this is not to say the North American Indians were not horribly abused and taken advantage of, and not to say they were not the victims of genocide. It is beyond question that they were. But for generations it was committed by individuals and sometimes groups of individuals; and sadly, very sadly, the eradication of the North American Indian became the policy of the United States Government. Not necessarily the people of the United States, but certainly its government. I will note briefly here that smallpox was introduced to South, Central, and North America by Spanish Explorers. In 1520 a group of Spanish explorers arrived in Vera Cruz, Mexico. Along with them was an African slave who was infected with smallpox. Before long the group, along with the slave, began exploring the North American continent, spreading the disease as they went.

Clearly then, it was not the Pilgrims. The Pilgrims also did not come to colonize North America. They were known as Separatists in their home country of England, and they were persecuted cruelly there. Many of them were thrown out of their churches, they were burdened by exorbitant fines, they were imprisoned in the most inhumane conditions imaginable, and they were executed. All for their faith, and nothing but their faith. By definition they were the victims of genocide, and they did not simply travel to America, but rather they escaped to America. The very ones that Mrs. Reid points to and accuses of genocide were actually the victims of genocide desperately trying to save their lives and the lives of their family. Would Mrs. Reid support the genocide of people for their religious belief? Does she pick and choose which genocide to condemn and which genocide to accept as good?

Again, as I have already pointed out, this is not that the North American Indians were not victims of genocide. Clearly they were. It must be understood, however, that not only were the North American Indians victims of genocide, they were also perpetrators of genocide, and they were not the first people in North America. The North American Indians are by and large descended from the Clovis People who migrated up from South America. Before they ever reached North America, however, the inhabitants of an area known as Berengia (sometimes known as the Bering Land Bridge, but far larger than you might imagine) began their migration to North America. These people initially came from what we now consider to be Siberia. They migrated to North America, along with animals such as the Woolly Mammoth and the Giant Ground Sloth and other creatures.

[Be sure to read Part Two here]
0 Comments

Atheist Argument #1: If God is Real, He Would Not Slaughter Millions of People, or Condemn People to Hell

4/25/2017

4 Comments

 
Picture
Atheist Argument #1 - If God is real, He would not slaughter millions of people or condemn people to hell

If God is real, argue the atheists, then He would be Omniscient, Omnipotent and Omnibenificient; and as such, He would not slaughter millions of people (as in the flood), He would not command the genocide of entire groups of people, and He would not condemn people to an eternal torture in hell simply because they do not follow or believe in Him. If such a God exists that does all of these things, then He is not worthy of worship, praise, or followers.

While at first glance this argument seems both logical and sound, it is based on assumptions and presuppositions that are not necessarily true. Let's look at the basic premises of this argument.

Premise #1: If God is real, He would be all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-loving.

Premise #2: If God is all-knowing, all-powerful, and all loving, then He would neither slaughter innocent people, nor would He command or allow the slaughtering of people.

Premise #3: God has both commanded the slaughter and Himself slaughtered millions of people throughout history.

Conclusion: God is either not real, or, if He is real, He is not worthy of worship, praise, or following.

As I pointed out, it is based on assumptions and presuppositions. The presuppositional bias of the atheist is that there is no God. Therefore, every one of his arguments is based on that presupposition, and that, in turn, causes the atheist to make assumptions that are not based on an accurate view of God. In this situation, God is assumed to be all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-loving. And He is. However, He is much more than that. God is also all-holy, all-righteous, all-just. He is the epitome of these various attributes, the standard of measure for them you might say.

In the argument posed by the atheist, he leaves these other attributes out of his description of God, thus describing a god that is not the God of the Bible, and then arguing against the god of his creation. This is a typical straw man argument posed by atheists.

Additionally, in order to make this argument, the atheist must ignore both the immediate context of the passage(s) he uses to support his argument (usually Genesis 5:32-10:1 [the Noahic flood], 1 Samuel 15 [the Amalekite genocide], Numbers 31 [the Midianite massacre] – there are others, but these are the most common), and also the overall context of the passage(s).

In taking these passages out of their proper context, the atheist implies in his argument that God's actions in these instances was arbitrary and capricious, the actions of a petulant 5-year old burning ants with a magnifying glass (as one atheist put it), rather than a loving God. The reality of these situations as clearly presented within the context of the passages, however, presents a completely different story.

As noted above, while God is all-loving, He is also completely holy, just and righteous. He is the one who established those character attributes. In other words, He defines morality. He determines what is holy, just and righteous, and what is not. He determines what is right and good, and what is wrong and evil.

In every instance noted in the “genocide” passages brought up by atheists to support their premises, those who were killed were not killed simply because God woke up in a bad mood and decided to kill a bunch of people. There was no capriciousness involved in God's decisions. There was justice. Those who were killed were suffering the wrath of a righteous holy God who had allowed them every opportunity to stop their evil and repent of it. But they chose not to. Instead, they made the conscious decision to continue living in the most based of depravities. They were, in each instance, wantonly engaging in the most wicked of sins. They were engaging in rampant idol worship, prostitution (that involved children), pedophilia, rape, bestiality, homosexuality – including ritualistic homosexuality with children, drunken orgies, and child sacrifice which involved the burning alive of babies and toddlers.

These people were warned by God to stop living in wanton, gross sin; and, they were warned for years – for 120 years in the case of the Noahic flood. They knew what they were doing was displeasing to God, they knew what the ultimate consequence would be, and yet they either chose to ignore the warnings, or they chose to not believe in God, thus rejecting Him out of hand. And, they continually tried to involve the Israelites – the people of God – and corrupt them as well. In many cases they succeeded, and in those cases the Israelites suffered the same consequences. As Jonathan Edwards pointed out in his sermon of the same name, it is a terrible thing to fall into the hands of an angry God!

As we all know, there are consequences for every decision we make. Sometimes those consequences are good, sometimes neutral, and sometimes decidedly less than pleasant. And the degree of our actions often determines the degree of the consequences we face. In the case of those who fell under God's wrath, the sins were not the sins of some of the people in those groups, but rather involved sins on a national level. Virtually everyone in those groups were engaged in those sins, and God judged them as nations, as well as individuals. This is what He has historically done with nations whose sin is so rampant and so wicked among the inhabitants of those nations or people groups.

And what about those who were part of those nations and people groups who were not involved in the sin of their nation or people group? As shown in numerous examples in Scripture, God removes them from the coming wrath, thus sparing them. Noah and his family, Lot and his family, the Israelites spared the plagues, The Babylonian captivity and the destruction of Jerusalem, Rahab, Esther, and so on are all examples of God sparing His people from destruction by removing them from the situation.

Thus, the atheist argument is, as has been shown, a straw man argument, and not a valid argument against God. More importantly, however, is the lesson clearly shown in those instances when God, in His ultimate holiness, righteousness and justice, endures the sins of man for just so long before man stands condemned as a result of his sin; and as can also be seen, the degree of sin seems to also have an impact on the timing of God's wrath. The more depraved an individual or nation becomes, it seems the sooner God's wrath comes and calamity ensues.

Of course, regardless of whatever wrath a sinful man or a sinful nation faces temporally, there is still the coming judgment, and those who continue to remain in their sin and continue to remain in their rejection of God, will face eternal judgment for their choice. Food for thought.
4 Comments
    Picture

    Archives

    July 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    October 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    July 2014

    Categories

    All
    2 Corinthians 6:14-18
    5 Solas
    95 Theses
    Aaron Thompson
    Abuse
    Agnosticism
    Alistair Begg
    Amber Guyger
    A Mighty Fortress Is Our God
    Angelic Revelations
    Angels
    Anne Graham Lotz
    An Open Letter To My Family And Friends
    Antinomianism
    Antiochian Orthodox
    Apocrypha
    Apologetics
    Apostasy
    Archibald Brown
    Armianism
    Arminian
    Atheism
    Atheist Arguments
    A.W. Pink
    Benjamin Knight
    Benjamin Naim
    Ben The Baptist
    Bethel Music
    Bible
    Bible Believer's Baptist Church
    Bible Contradictions
    Biblical Archaeology
    Biblical Interpretation
    Blasphemy
    Book Of Life
    Botham Jean
    Brandt Jean
    Calvinism
    Cannibalism
    Causa Finitum
    Challenge For Christians
    Charles Haddon Spurgeon
    Christianity
    Christian Life
    Christian Living
    Christian Love
    Church
    Church Of Almighty God
    Contemporary Christian Music
    Covid
    Covid 19
    Creeds
    Cults
    Death By Atheism
    Death By War
    Decisional Regeneration
    Denialism
    Dennis Grutzmacher
    Doctrines Of Demons
    Doctrines Of Grace
    Donald Trump
    Double Imputation
    Doubting
    Easter
    Eastern Lightning
    Edmund Sears
    Election 2016
    Elevation Music
    Ephesians 2:8 9
    Ephesians 2:8-9
    Erin M Harding
    Evangelizing
    Fall Of America
    False Christianity
    False Christians
    False Teachers
    Fatima
    FBQ's
    Fellowship With God
    Five Solas
    Free Ebook
    Friday Night Lectures
    Gaslighting
    Gay
    Genocide
    Gospel
    Hell
    Heresy
    Hermeneutics
    Hillsong Music
    Holiness
    Homosexual
    Homosexuality
    Hymns
    Idolatry
    Imputation
    Insanity
    Irresistible Grace
    Islam
    I Support Abuse Survivors
    Jackie Hill Perry
    James E Adams
    JC Ryle
    Jesus Culture
    John Calvin
    John MacArthur
    Jonathan Edwards
    Josh Buice
    Joshua Chavez
    Joy Reid
    Judging
    Julie Roys
    Justification
    Kenosis
    Kenotic
    Know Your Heresies
    Latter-Day Saints
    LDS Church
    Lesbian
    LGBT
    Liberalism
    Ligioner Ministries
    Ligonier Articles
    Limited Atonement
    Mark Batterson
    Martin Luther
    Martyn Lloyd-Jones
    Mary Worship
    Me Too
    Michael Servetus
    Mike Ratliff
    Monergism
    Moral Relativism
    Mormonism
    Mormons
    Mysticism
    Nancy Demoss Wogemuth
    Nauman Masih
    New IFB
    Old Testament
    Original Sin
    Persecution
    Perseverance Of The Saints
    Philadelphia Church Of God
    Pinecreek Doug
    Politics
    Pope Francis
    Prayer Circles
    Presidential Election
    Protestant
    Protestantism
    Pseudo-Christian
    Pseudo Christianity
    Pseudo-Christianity
    Race
    Racialism
    Racism
    Ravi Zacharias
    Reformation
    Reformation Day
    Reformed Theology
    Refuting The Bible
    Regeneration
    Religious Expression
    Religious Freedom Restoration Act
    Religious Pluralism
    Religious Wars
    Responding To Atheist Arguments
    Resurrection
    Resurrection Of Jesus
    Revoice
    Revoice Conference
    RFRA
    Roman Catholic
    Roman Catholic Church
    Roman Catholicism
    Romans 1 28 To 32
    Salvation
    Same Sex Marriage
    Saturday Night Movies
    Scripture Twisting
    Servus Christi
    Sin
    Southern Gospel
    Sovereignty Of God
    Steven Anderson
    Steven Furtick
    Sunday Morning Sermons
    Sure Foundation Baptist Church
    Swedenborgianism
    Synergism
    The Bible
    The Cathedrals
    The Christian Creed
    The Heart
    Theology
    The Trinity
    Ticky Tok Toddy Harding
    Todd Ferguson
    Tolerance
    Tom Ascol
    Tom Buck
    Total Depravity
    Traits Of A Debased Mind
    Trinity
    True Christianity
    True Christians
    TULIP
    Unconditional Election
    Unitarianism
    United Methodist Church
    Vaccine
    Voting
    Waldens
    Website Updates
    What Is A Christian
    What's The Difference
    Wheat And Tares
    William Lane Craig
    Wolf Alert
    Women Pastors


    Click here to read about the Persecution of Christians in America.

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.